ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agoHarm Reduction Rulelocklemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1478arrow-down1imageHarm Reduction Rulelocklemmy.blahaj.zoneToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square192fedilinkfile-text
There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoIf that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn’t you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?
If that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn’t you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?