dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoRulelemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down10
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.sdf.orgdadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 years agoI know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoIt is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years ago“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoWell not entirely different. They’re both named George.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoTrue. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoThey also both had sons named George.
I know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
It is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
Well not entirely different. They’re both named George.
True. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
They also both had sons named George.