• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The only thing about goblins is that they are bankers.

    That’s categorically NOT true.

    If you hear bankers, and think Jews, that may be that You are stereotyping.

    Or maybe the fact that you see figures modeled after a Nazi stereotype of Jewish people and think “just bankers” is a You ignoring the obvious to defend the indefensible thing.

    Shacklebolt and Cho Chang I consider just poorly though through names

    Nobody forced her to give them racist names. That she did so anyway is lazy stereotyping at best, intentional racist belittling at worst.

    As for the elves being slaves, that has depth.

    Here we go with the slavery apologia…

    The characters in the books ask them, if they like what they are doing. They like it, they talk about it, we see the point of view of elves

    Just because they’ve been institutionalized to think that slavery is the only way of life for them doesn’t make it ok.

    She could easily NOT have had slaves in a world where everything they’re forced to do can be accomplished with magic. But no, she CHOSE for there to be slaves and then endorse slavery by making the slaves “want it”

    It may be my childhood innocence talking, but I never took it as malicious writing

    Definitely you missing it at first, yes. Which is understandable for a child. You should know better than to defend it now, though.

    Maybe unconscious stereotyping. But it was the 90s, she didn’t know better

    That’s bullshit. She had full control of an entire magical world and CHOSE to inject unchallenged and lampshaded bigotry into it.

    Whether the 1990s or the fucking 1890s, it’s her job to know better and do better.

    But all in all now she is a shit human being

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks for the comments, Man. I appreciate the fact, that You want to talk about it. If You let me, I Will respond later, as now I’m after a night shift and drunk. Would You be willing to tell me Your age? I think that is an important thing in analysing HP and the authors views. I was born in 87,but I’m polish, so the books got to me a little bit later than most st of the world.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        If You let me, I Will respond later, as now I’m after a night shift and drunk

        Sure, enjoy your night lol

        Would You be willing to tell me Your age? I think that is an important thing in analysing HP and the authors views. I was born in 87,but I’m polish, so the books got to me a little bit later than most st of the world.

        I’m 41 but didn’t read them as they came out but rather well into my twenties.

        Embarrassingly, I missed a lot of the more problematic stuff back then in spite of not being a child, but I thought harder about it later when learning from others spelling it out for me heh