• Bob@feddit.nldeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, for one thing, I’m citing the opposite of conventional wisdom, and for the other thing, I’m not saying hands are more or less germ-prone than fresh gloves; I’m arguing the opposite, namely, that they’re as clean as each other. You should really pay attention before being such a sarky cunt.

        • Bob@feddit.nldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          For handling food, they certainly are as clean as each other! Unless you think gloves magically repel dust and so on while sitting in the open box on the kitchen shelf?

            • Bob@feddit.nldeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Or literally ON biological material?

              That you’ve just washed? Nope! On a glove that’s been worn so long it’s got shite all over it? Yep!

                • Bob@feddit.nldeleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Cherry picking to sound smart.

                  It was my point to begin with so I’m bringing it back within context!