• Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 days ago

    He doesn’t like bike lanes because no one rides bikes. If only we could figure out why no one rides bikes…

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m actually more concerned that he doesn’t see people using bike lanes. I know exactly which type of driver he is as I’m out there riding in the lanes and street where lanes don’t exist.

      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 days ago

        Sounds like he hasent been anywhere downtown or near any light rail stops in years if he never sees anyone riding bikes/scooters. They are all over.

    • kinther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I am going to be the minority here, but I also rarely see people use bike lanes. I live in the north end and don’t often go downtown where I know more people are biking. At least on N 125th/130th, Pinehurst Way, and even Campus Way near North Seattle College, it is a shock seeing anyone use the bike lanes at all.

      I drive those routes five days a week. I am not against bike lanes, but… at a certain point when you don’t see people using them you start questioning whether they need to be everywhere.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        13 days ago

        Not from the area, but do your bike lanes look like this?

        These types are death gulches, and are super spooky to use, since you can get people drifting in from the left and smashing into you, or someone opening their car door from the right and knocking you down into the active road.

        If you don’t have the type that are protected, or they are, but aren’t connected to a larger network, they aren’t terribly useful the same way a dirt road isn’t useful for inner city traffic.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        Bike lanes are the absolute bare minimum and suck to ride in, everyday people aren’t going to ride in a bike lane. If you’re saying we shouldn’t install bike lanes in favor of better bicycle infrastructure like separated bike paths I’m all for that obviously, but we also shouldn’t let perfection get in the way of progress. Connecting the network of bike lanes is progress, as the only thing that sucks more than riding in a bike lane is when the bike lane ends without warning, dumping you into traffic.

      • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        The bike lanes on 130th are pretty useless right now, they connect from nothing to nothing, but eventually they’ll link the Interurban trail to the light rail station and down to Lake City, so I think they will see a lot more use when they’re finished.

  • When we talk about bike lanes in general, there aren’t enough people riding bikes to make it worthwhile. There’s too many cars on the road. It’s unrealistic to say we’re going to put in bike lanes, but there aren’t enough people riding bikes. What are we gonna do? Tell everyone to go out and buy a bike? How many people are going to do that?

    Someone teach this guy what “induced demand” is.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    When you widen roads, more people get in cars and create more traffic. So yes, if you make it safer to ride bikes, more people will get on bikes to get around.

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    The biggest problem, as I see it, is that even in this interview he demonstrates a lack of knowledge on subjects that he claims to be passionate about.

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      There’s 99 problems with that person and the one you choose had to be discriminatory. Well done.

      • GimmeUrBelt@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Politics are volatile and world-destroying. Young people can be smart. Young people can be wise. But mostly, young people are neither. I don’t give a fuck if it’s discrimination.

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          So, once again we are going to judge politicians by their cover instead of their stance? Sure has worked well so far. As long as you can drink a beer with them, it’s alright, no?

            • Decq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yes because he’s too young, not because whether he’s a bad politician or not.

              • GimmeUrBelt@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                13 days ago

                Well see, that’s your issue there. A bad politician is still a politician. Someone interested in politics at the age of 19 is not.

                • Decq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  In a country where someone as dumb and unfit to be a politician as trump can become president, you can hardly rule out anyone from being a politician. Jesus fuck even a toddler would be more fit than him.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      He can’t be ASB president any longer so this is his next vaugely logical step.

      If he gets the votes to win, its not his fault.