BolexForSoup

Now there’s a hoopy frood who knows where his towel is

You cannot be of joinings Toki’s special club

Some comments were talking about transfer speeds/throughput yes but that is not what I’m referring to

I’m not even an enterprise and I personally have about 35TB of externals mounted on my computer right now. I can’t even fathom what IBM or whatever needs

Won’t it be grand?

It is astounding how many comments on that article don’t know about 3-2-1, which is industry standard. Yet they feel qualified enough to say that this is “putting all your eggs in one basket” and make it sound like this is a bad idea.

I mean, do they not realize that was the exact same problem 10 years ago with 10TB HDD’s? And that we’ve had a protocol for literally decades to address it? Have they not heard of backups? Are they under the impression they’re only allowed to buy one?

I swear it’s not enough for everyone to have an opinion on everything. It’s not even enough for them to vocalize it. They have to sound smug and act like these companies are completely foolish for even making these. I don’t even understand how arrogant you have to be to operate like that on a regular basis.

Sincerely, some with several 18-20TB HDD’s drooling for this.

deleted by creator

For a few seconds there I got excited because I thought this was an ace combat reference

You are some petty. Have a good one.

I didn’t stop listening. I read what you wrote. You are not entitled to my attention, to be blunt. And vice versa!

This is a fight now, it’s not a discussion. We both made our cases, we both processed the other’s argument (I hope), and we both still disagree. Let’s just move on.

Alright I can tell when a conversation isn’t productive anymore. Have a good rest of your weekend.

When did I say a doctor can override a patient? That’s not remotely the standard of care in the US. Calling that a red herring is generous.

I think the thrust of their point is it’s between the individual and their doctor if they want to pursue medical things. The state should not be prescribing what they can/can’t do in this domain and getting in the way of their relationship with their doctor. Much like the argument that keeping a pregnancy/aborting is between a pregnant individual and their doctor. It’s a shorthand way of putting it we all sort of get. Yes they should be able to do it because it’s their body but generally the whole thing involves a doctor one way or another.

I would actually be incredibly surprised if Trump was able to run again in four years. There are a lot of reasons he probably won’t be able to (assuming he loses 2024 which is definitely a tossup right now).

Well said

Ah I guess the terms have become somewhat conflated then. Either way, there are definitely large swaths of the child free crowd that are incredibly hostile to parents and children.

I saw someone describe it as “anti-natalist” which i feel is way more apt. Don’t want kids? Child free. Hate people for having children/make up strawmen to grind an axe all the time about it? You’re anti-natalist.

deleted by creator

That happened to me with no man’s sky lol

deleted by creator