c/fuckcars

and how do you know no one did? it’s not like they can report after they die. they can’t even downvote you for killing them. it’s the perfect crime.

when you draw a symbol for anarchy the make sure you follow these guidelines

She is, and she’s pretty much credited her autism for her focus and drive on these issues.

I’m sorry if that felt too harsh about US culture. i take it back. I should have said it’s like satirizing the US education system by shooting up a school.

I’d argue that’s why it’s not good satire. this just goes straight into another conspiracy theory now. satire doesn’t really work when it straight up contributes to what it’s supposed to be satirizing.

that’s like satirizing the US culture by shooting up a school.

yeah that’s the elephant in a lot of eastern countries.

wow this would go hard if it had more than 32 pixels

i like the “no Nazis in Valhalla” phrase because Valhalla is an idea, not a real thing. but let’s not pretend vikings were good people just to spite Nazis. you’re just doing the same mythologizing.

hey quarterpounder can you tell us when you take a break from pissing in the basement while your wife is fucking someone else outside, why would you assume this is about charlie kirk?

i need something like this for people who have smoked in the last 12 hours. everywhere.

also not mentally sound at all himself. he gets traumatized as a child and starts dressing like a bat calling himself the dark knight or whatever the fuck he does. pretty much his entire rogues gallery are mentally ill people, he never puts an end to anything, never make any of them get better, never gets rid of any of them for good, just beats them up for fun and terrorizes two bit street criminals. i don’t even know what really makes him different from any of the arkham asylum escapees.

me too and I’m a dude

well then explain to me how to get an external battery out of the pack and chug its contents.

guess what? you can’t, because it’s not an external battery pack. it’s a spare battery.

it’s a battery that you have as a spare in case your main battery runs out. it’s a spare battery.

it means it was not part of the original quote; either changed or inserted by the quoting party for clarity or grammatical consistency. compare:

the driver told the ice agent to gargle his balls.

there are no quotes, calls into question how much of it is the reporter’s wording. here you would probably assume he said “gargle my balls” but if the quote was “fuck off” it would be more ambiguous: is was the actual quote “fuck off” or did he say something like “get the fuck outta here” and the reporter’s summarizing?

the driver told the ice agent to “gargle his balls”

the entire thing is in quotes, so did he literally say “gargle his balls”? whose balls? there’s a third person involved? this is also essentially lying since quotation marks suggest everything inside is a direct quote.

the driver told the ice agent to “gargle my balls”

the quote is correct but the sentence reads—and especially sounds—like the reporter is talking about their balls.

so the solution here is to change “my” to “[his]” to make it read correctly while acknowledging that it’s not part of the exact quote despite the quotation marks.

sometimes words are changed for clarity, for example:

then he says “[journalists] always find a way to spin”

this suggests that the original quote probably had a pronoun instead, like “they always find a way to spin” or maybe he said something like “motherfuckers always find a way to spin”. either way sometimes the flow of the article would make the sentence ambiguous unless who “they” or “motherfuckers” refers to is noted.

or sometimes a word is added for clarity or consistency:

“It was incredible to see Zohran [Mamdani] got elected.”

this could mean the speaker originally just said Zohran, and the reporter is adding the last name for clarification or consistency with how he’s been referred to throughout the article.

sometimes the words are changed to fix the original quote:

“I was shocked when they elected [Mamdani]”

this might be because the original quote was mispronounced or misspelled (“Mandami" or whatever)

or sometimes [sic] is added to point that the error was left in by the reporter deliberately to note that the original quote had the misspelling or mispronunciation:

"I was shocked when they elected Mandami [sic]“

this means the reporter left in the mistake on purpose because the original quote had it, and clarifies that it’s not a typo by the reporter. otherwise the reader would be unclear as to whether the original quote was correct but the reporting has a typo, or whether the original quote had it wrong.

finally there’s […] which means parts of the original quote were cut out for brevity or again clarity. maybe the original quote was too rambling or confusing.

then i don’t know what you’re arguing here, which threat i mentioned was neutralized?

then please accept my condolences for the unjust, cruel murder of the poor UnitedHealth CEO, i really hope the same won’t happen to every IOF soldier who’s very humanely playing a game of shooting children in the genitals for fun today, because shooting off limbs day was yesterday.

again you’re conflating why they dehumanize and why i do. they do it because of racism and bigotry, when they say not human they literally mean not the same species. when i say it it’s because I’ve seen them doing inhuman deeds gleefully. it does not mean they are a different species, it means they don’t deserve the dignity and respect than humans do. again “if you do it you’re no different” is bullshit.