An ecosocialist world would not allow wealth inequality to become this bad.

We don’t live in one. The challenge is to make one.

It’s a biological fact when resources are constrained that a population will plateu.

Mice and fleas don’t have medicine, feminism, research centres and agriculture. Look at the world around you. In societies with high degrees of scarcity and high infant mortality, humans have tended to have a lot of babies. This is true now, and it was true historically. On the flipside, in societies with high development indexes, humans tend to not have many kids. From Japan to Sweden to Cuba, you see that fertility rates inversely correlate with human development. These are just observable facts.

I mean, the “I’m sorry if it makes me an ecofascist, but” line was a dead giveaway from the start.

Oh, so you get to decide who gets to have kids and how many? And the “trailer park welfare mom” is your problem? Like, the straw(wo)man you made up with ingredients from classism, sexism and eugenics?

Yea, that makes you a regular fascist. The “eco” is just the excuse.

What a bullshit dilemma.

And you are wrong that wealth inequality causes the drop in birth rates. The birth rate was higher in the Dickensian times of Britain compared to now. If anything, it is wealth equality, universal positive rights, and women’s liberation that tend to make people have fewer kids.

A ecosocialist world is a sustainable one. An ecofascist world is just a death spiral.

You first, buddy.

If not, this is just a slippery slope argument to “those other people shouldn’t exist/have babies”. That’s just the door to eco-fascism.

There absolutely are women who like Warhammer.

Historicals though… I’ve never seen a woman excited about fielding an army of Burgundians against a bunch of English. It can get worse… Napoleonics, ancient stuff…

Ok. Come back when red terror is the topic of discussion.

What’s a DEI chin??

Right. I’m wasting my time, I see. Go troll somewhere else buddy.

That’s 1995.

Let’s swallow the Russia bit, right? Because Russian history from Ivan III to Nicholas II is basically exactly imperialist colonialism.

And then you just focus on the China bit. Yes, the westerners did that to China in the past. Does that mean that modern day China is structurally incapable of being an imperialist country in the 21st century? Or because the CCP pays lip service to socialism (while Xi tells people to train as Confucians) we’re supposed to ignore the actual capitalist nature of its economy/society?

deleted by creator

The USSR did not fall because of a US coup. It collapsed because of its own internal contradictions.

Where are the MLs to explain that lgbt ideology is a western imperialist plot.

I’m deleting the community, because !tabletopminis@lemmy.world exists and has a bigger userbase.

I couldn’t find anything when I searched, but maybe I didn’t search right. Can you please give the link?