although this is unlikely to substantially and directly impact us and is a more immediate concern for Mastodon and similar fediverse software, we’ve signed the Anti-Meta Fedi Pact as a matter of principle. that pact pledges the following:

i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity

the maintainer of the site is currently a little busy and seems to manually add signatures so we may not appear on there for several days but here’s a quick receipt that we did indeed sign it.

  • static@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How can we promote open standards like activitypub while blocking anone else entry.

    On meta this is difficult, any Non disclosure Agreement is evil, Everything has to be in the open. and considering the history of FB/meta i’m verry sceptical. But still, open standards, open discussion , i am a bit of an optimist.

    • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Promoting interoperability does not mean accepting bad actors. We can build something without bad actors. They can use ActivityPub and use it with people who are fine with Facebook, people don’t need to accept it though.

      Just like we can encourage the usage of HTTP and the Web without hosting and giving place to all websites on another website. For example, I have a personal website and encourage people to do so. That doesn’t mean I need to link and interact with all websites that exist.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta are already reaching out to fediverse devs and inviting them to secret NDA covered meetings.