"no" banana@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agorule of calciumlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1545arrow-down14
arrow-up1541arrow-down1imagerule of calciumlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·7 months agoYou do know that steel reinforced necromantic constructs have been outlawed since the great wizard convention of 1848??
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 months agoOutlawed, yes, but that doesn’t preclude their use by nefarious interests.
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoYou are correct. It does however seem highly unlikely that such a construct would be placed inside a museum though. Anyone having to do anything with it would immediately be investigated by the wizard police.
minus-square"no" banana@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoI, for one, think that skeletal improvement might be a desirable pursuit.
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoPfft, who the hell even reads wizarding texts?
minus-squareWIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoThat is common knowledge among educated necromancer.
You do know that steel reinforced necromantic constructs have been outlawed since the great wizard convention of 1848??
Outlawed, yes, but that doesn’t preclude their use by nefarious interests.
You are correct. It does however seem highly unlikely that such a construct would be placed inside a museum though. Anyone having to do anything with it would immediately be investigated by the wizard police.
I, for one, think that skeletal improvement might be a desirable pursuit.
Pfft, who the hell even reads wizarding texts?
That is common knowledge among educated necromancer.