hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-24 个月前rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square193linkfedilinkarrow-up1946arrow-down130file-text
arrow-up1916arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-24 个月前message-square193linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-24 个月前And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 个月前And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.