kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down10
arrow-up1165arrow-down1imageNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zonekivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months ago140 if you’re fancy https://macronsafety.com/product/industrial/arc-flash-ppe/oberon-arc140b-flash-coverall-suit/
minus-square0x0@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months ago The suit is not intended for use as a bulletproof vest. This is so American
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months ago The window and suit tested to a V50 of 712 ft/sec with a ballistic threat using a .22″ fragment, and 789 ft/sec with a .308″ fragment. It is an understandable clarification to include.
minus-squaresetVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoIs it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
minus-squarelemming741@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWhat will they think of next
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoPaying for remote racking? 😅
140 if you’re fancy
https://macronsafety.com/product/industrial/arc-flash-ppe/oberon-arc140b-flash-coverall-suit/
This is so American
It is an understandable clarification to include.
Is it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
What will they think of next
Paying for remote racking?
😅