Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoDoglovian rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1440arrow-down14
arrow-up1436arrow-down1imageDoglovian rulelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·1 month ago Everybody has always known that dogs are trainable Holy shallow interpretation, Batman! To reduce Pavlov’s conclusions to “dogs = trainable” is the equivalent of saying that Newton’s laws of motion boil down to “things move sometimes” 🤦🏻
minus-squarefartographer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoThat’s completely wrong. Newton also said, “things don’t move sometimes.”
minus-square🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoHis contribution was using gastric windows and other operation to find that ‘training’ can affect non conscious things too. with a lot of creepy animal cruelty
minus-squaredihutenosa@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoDid you read what I said? Somehow you managed to misinterpret it to have the opposite meaning.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoOops! Oh well, pobody’s nerfect 🤷🏻
Holy shallow interpretation, Batman!
To reduce Pavlov’s conclusions to “dogs = trainable” is the equivalent of saying that Newton’s laws of motion boil down to “things move sometimes” 🤦🏻
That’s completely wrong. Newton also said, “things don’t move sometimes.”
His contribution was using gastric windows and other operation to find that ‘training’ can affect non conscious things too.
with a lot of creepy animal cruelty
Did you read what I said? Somehow you managed to misinterpret it to have the opposite meaning.
Oops! Oh well, pobody’s nerfect 🤷🏻
nerf herder