not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 days agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down14
arrow-up1662arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square71linkfedilink
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days agoLet me help you out. It was this one: A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably in more danger than a drunk 21 year old in a car.
minus-squareTaldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 days agoThat statement is technically correct Mile per mile, drunk walking and biking is more dangerous than drunk driving for the individual. Obviously why drunk driving is not okay is the danger to others, which is why his wording specifically only mentioned the danger to themselves Source
Let me help you out. It was this one:
That statement is technically correct
Mile per mile, drunk walking and biking is more dangerous than drunk driving for the individual. Obviously why drunk driving is not okay is the danger to others, which is why his wording specifically only mentioned the danger to themselves
Source