TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agorule partylemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down115
arrow-up1402arrow-down1imagerule partylemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square40linkfedilink
minus-squareSlein4273@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days agoI think i need someone to explain me the joke, please
minus-squareFreddiesLantern@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up58·2 days agoI think the joke is that traditionally (or heteronormatively speaking) women get in for free and men have to pay. “Because women attract men. Not so much visa versa.” (That’s the college fratboy logic, not mine tbc). Non binaries don’t even enter that conversation. In this post the priorities are reversed.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days agoIs this why there is nobody at the party in the picture though? 🤔
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.socialBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoIt’s advertising the party… I mean, it’s obviously a joke (probably) but the conceit is that it’s an advertisement ahead of time.
I think i need someone to explain me the joke, please
I think the joke is that traditionally (or heteronormatively speaking) women get in for free and men have to pay. “Because women attract men. Not so much visa versa.” (That’s the college fratboy logic, not mine tbc).
Non binaries don’t even enter that conversation.
In this post the priorities are reversed.
Is this why there is nobody at the party in the picture though? 🤔
It’s advertising the party… I mean, it’s obviously a joke (probably) but the conceit is that it’s an advertisement ahead of time.