I used https://stanza.stanford.edu/ and Universal Dependencies is correct while Constituency Parse is wrong, so I’m not the only one, even the computer got it wrong.
The thing is that “the things you believe” already sounds like a phrase so “make you unlovable” seems to refere to “the things” but in fact is a subclause to “believe”
Are beautiful?
Yes, “the things” (that you believe make you unloveable) “are beautiful”
So I think they make me unlovable but they think they are beautiful. Boy, I need a syntax tree to parse this.
Well you got it now. And I think that’s beautiful. 😁
Anyway, here is the tree:
I used https://stanza.stanford.edu/ and Universal Dependencies is correct while Constituency Parse is wrong, so I’m not the only one, even the computer got it wrong.
The thing is that “the things you believe” already sounds like a phrase so “make you unlovable” seems to refere to “the things” but in fact is a subclause to “believe”
Yes you are