fyi: it’s “drugs”

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Anarchy sounds nice until you have a task big enough to require people to work together, or to do shitty work no one wants to do, or to deal with outside aggressors, or to resolve conflict.

    There’s probably something in between anarchy, dictatorship, republic, communism that works, but we haven’t found it yet.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The outside aggressors are a legitimate problem, but anarchist societies (e.g. Catalonia) have dealt with the others just fine.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        One might argue that a 3-year test just post civil war wasn’t a solid shakedown cruise.

        I’m fairly certain the US would just devolve into internal armed conflict and a return to slavery.

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Perhaps, but since just about every other system has already devolved into internal armed conflict and slavery at various points, it seems like a good idea to try the one that hasn’t yet.