i wouldnt say its harmless. if people treat everything likes its AI, it becomes the norm and a subgroup pf people stop treating calls against AI seriously.
The boy who cried wolf is a retold story for a reason.
Its also arguably equally as offensive to call an actual artists work AI in the same vein as the oppsite.
Disagreed. It often gets argumentative and hostile, and it’s usually futile. It spams up the comment sections and invites downvotes for what might be a false accusation.
…And does it really matter, if it’s not obvious and seems hand drawn? Or photographed, CGI’d or whatever.
I think its only does if OP is trying to sell it, promote themselves or something scummy like that (which is clearly not the case here).
Counterpoint: It’s funny and harmless. Only by discussing what is(n’t) AI slop will we get better at finding it.
i wouldnt say its harmless. if people treat everything likes its AI, it becomes the norm and a subgroup pf people stop treating calls against AI seriously.
The boy who cried wolf is a retold story for a reason.
Its also arguably equally as offensive to call an actual artists work AI in the same vein as the oppsite.
Disagreed. It often gets argumentative and hostile, and it’s usually futile. It spams up the comment sections and invites downvotes for what might be a false accusation.
…And does it really matter, if it’s not obvious and seems hand drawn? Or photographed, CGI’d or whatever.
I think its only does if OP is trying to sell it, promote themselves or something scummy like that (which is clearly not the case here).
It’s also incredibly insulting to work on a piece like this and just be accused of generating it. Or maybe it’s a compliment?
I’m not sure how I feel about it lol
You should feel great, because your work is fantastic ✨