Jorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 11 days agoWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square60linkfedilinkarrow-up175arrow-down11
arrow-up174arrow-down1imageWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeJorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square60linkfedilink
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·8 days agosure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
minus-squarewerty@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agoIt’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoi reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)
sure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
It’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
i reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)