Gormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agoGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netimagemessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up1924arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1915arrow-down1imageGorillaz Based of Course [Rule]slrpnk.netGormadt@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square57linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·6 days ago Now you tell him why he’s wrong. he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·6 days agoYou know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”. But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·6 days agobut I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait. I want to humiliate rage baiters
minus-squareAzuranAurora@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·6 days agoYou’re only humiliating yourself.
![Gorillaz Based of Course [Rule]](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/5a959005-1f02-40b2-b5f2-f55691ef753c.png){kind=link}
he’s wrong because he’s edgy, and the discussion on his points have been done for centuries by better people than me.
You know, you can just say “I refuse to engage with your obvious rage bait”.
But he’s not wrong because he’s edgy. He’s wrong because he’s wrong. Or not. As the case might be.
but I don’t want to not engage with obvious rage bait.
I want to humiliate rage baiters
You’re only humiliating yourself.