If you’re willing to commit rape, you’re already a rapist even if you haven’t done it yet. Not legally, of course, but morally speaking there’s no difference between wanting to do it and doing it.
I just think it’s interesting that even in that short comment, you avoid assigning blame to the rapist and instead choose the passive “someone gets raped”.
Kinda like when cops shoot people. It’s always “person of interest was shot” instead of “the police shot the suspect”.
If you’re willing to commit rape, you’re already a rapist even if you haven’t done it yet. Not legally, of course, but morally speaking there’s no difference between wanting to do it and doing it.
There is a huge, giant fucking massive difference between someone that would plausibly commit rape and someone who has committed rape.
The main difference is in one case, someone gets raped.
Well, yeah. There’s a huge difference for the victim. But I wouldn’t say lack of opportunity is a moral victory for the would-be rapist.
Interesting use of passive voice.
Brother really had no argument.
“Erm you use the wrong there/their. The’refour your argument is invalid”-ass response
I just think it’s interesting that even in that short comment, you avoid assigning blame to the rapist and instead choose the passive “someone gets raped”.
Kinda like when cops shoot people. It’s always “person of interest was shot” instead of “the police shot the suspect”.