aaargh this image sucks. It 100% looks like AI slop but at the same time I can’t really find the definitive gotcha that reveals it as such. just smol inconsistencies you could explain away with human imperfections too, and the tingly spider sensation I get from the colors and the font.
I saw that one latch next to the belt buckle and thought “ya thats weird but could be human error” and then completely ignored it when zooming in on the image ugh. certified dumbass over here ._.
The giveaway for me is the color grading. It’s as if the entire image had a layer of brown or yellow layered over it- not as strong as the classic yellow one but it’s definitely there.
You are absolutely wrong. Just go look at the recent AI flyer trend. AI has and will always have tells (as long as we talk about the traditional DCGAN distill noise to image concept that’s the norm right now). You can minimize them with more effort, but a lot of people don’t even go thru that effort or know that AI image gen extends far past the “ChatGPT make me a image” paradigm.
The most obviouo ones are oneshot generations who don‘t even care about issues. But with own pestprocessing you can do a lot better. Or just generating parts of the image and arrange them freely, including covering the worst issues. Maybe I should try how good that can work with local AI and Krita/GIMP
Yip. Considering how good AI image gen can actually be, those oneshots are just a spit in my face that very obviously say “I do not care how this looks, fuck you for complaining”.
Also idk if “pestprocessing” was a typo but it fits so well here xD
aaargh this image sucks. It 100% looks like AI slop but at the same time I can’t really find the definitive gotcha that reveals it as such. just smol inconsistencies you could explain away with human imperfections too, and the tingly spider sensation I get from the colors and the font.
It’s the pants. Specifically, the belt buckle and the artifacting in her pants.
Sorry.
Well done, you earned a coupon:
Oh yea, thats a pretty obvious one i missed somehow
I saw that one latch next to the belt buckle and thought “ya thats weird but could be human error” and then completely ignored it when zooming in on the image ugh. certified dumbass over here ._.
The giveaway for me is the color grading. It’s as if the entire image had a layer of brown or yellow layered over it- not as strong as the classic yellow one but it’s definitely there.
Can’t you do that manually with an image editor?
yea it could definitely be a stylistic decision. tho one you shouldn’t make in the age of the pissfilter 2.0
When pissfilter 3.0! 2.0.succkkksss
I think the glasses are a suitable indicator.
What’s wrong with them?
Modern models don’t really have tells anymore. They either explode really obviously or good enough that they just look like a normal casual artist.
The small hints and tells just don’t really happen anymore. Doubly so if words are added by hand :/
You are absolutely wrong. Just go look at the recent AI flyer trend. AI has and will always have tells (as long as we talk about the traditional DCGAN distill noise to image concept that’s the norm right now). You can minimize them with more effort, but a lot of people don’t even go thru that effort or know that AI image gen extends far past the “ChatGPT make me a image” paradigm.
The most obviouo ones are oneshot generations who don‘t even care about issues. But with own pestprocessing you can do a lot better. Or just generating parts of the image and arrange them freely, including covering the worst issues. Maybe I should try how good that can work with local AI and Krita/GIMP
Yip. Considering how good AI image gen can actually be, those oneshots are just a spit in my face that very obviously say “I do not care how this looks, fuck you for complaining”.
Also idk if “pestprocessing” was a typo but it fits so well here xD
It was a typo. They obviously want a cheap and fast solution.