Andromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down10
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgAndromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareCatt (she/her)@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-21 year agoNope, the text is correct. not (x or y) <=> (not x) and (not y) not (x and y) <=> (not x) or (not y) Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoAh yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense
Nope, the text is correct.
Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
Ah yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense