erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1829arrow-down112
arrow-up1817arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down1·4 months agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
That’s more or less what it historically was
but could female humans be called femaleman?
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.