erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1820arrow-down112
arrow-up1808arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down1·1 month agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
That’s more or less what it historically was
but could female humans be called femaleman?
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.