That sounds like bullshit as such clauses are nonexistent and nonenforceable in Germany
Edit: I’ve seen they’ve put this bullshit in. It does make me wonder if they’ve used ChatGPT to generate this. I’m not a lawyer and this is not legal advice but I would be very surprised if this would hold up in court. There is a reason that no big company or like nearly all companies don’t have this in their ToS with end customers as it would probably get thrown out in court immediately
Some Law firms also write that this is not possible with end customers
oh interesting, I haven’t seen that in my searches, aside from AI I only see them clarifying the terms. Mastodon.social makes it stupidly difficult to find their terms of service, and they way they have the website makes it so the wayback machine can’t archive it, so I can’t see what the previous terms were. That’s super annoying.
Updated the terms of service to say that you cannot sue them and have to submit to arbitration.
That sounds like bullshit as such clauses are nonexistent and nonenforceable in Germany
Edit: I’ve seen they’ve put this bullshit in. It does make me wonder if they’ve used ChatGPT to generate this. I’m not a lawyer and this is not legal advice but I would be very surprised if this would hold up in court. There is a reason that no big company or like nearly all companies don’t have this in their ToS with end customers as it would probably get thrown out in court immediately
Some Law firms also write that this is not possible with end customers
https://cenacom.com/zwingende-schlichtungs-und-mediationsklauseln-in-agb-unzulaessig/
oh interesting, I haven’t seen that in my searches, aside from AI I only see them clarifying the terms. Mastodon.social makes it stupidly difficult to find their terms of service, and they way they have the website makes it so the wayback machine can’t archive it, so I can’t see what the previous terms were. That’s super annoying.