• bingrazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s because the Scouts (formerly Boy Scouts) started accepting girls in 2019, prompting the name change. However, they are a separate organization from the Girl Scouts so they still exist. But without that context it does sound sexist

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      they want to make it sound like it’s not just for boys

      there were a number of years in the middle where girls were allowed to join but it was still called boy scouts

      girl scouts is a separate organization tho, idk if they really have influence over each other

      • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        yeah, my recollection is (simplified and excluding nonbinary) Scouts USA = boys and girls allowed, historically only boys. popcorn. around here, better facilities overall. Girls Scouts = no boys, historically only girls. cookies. around here, better program overall. as in all local organizations, whether you have a good troop/club/whatever depends on the local individuals more than the governing organization.

        • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The only part of being in girl scouts I liked, selling those cookies. Me, twin, and a red ryder wagon filled with cookies going door to door.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Would you also call it “normal” sports and women’s sports, since women are allowed in men’s sports but not the other way around?

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes in that case? Thats kind of a dumb question. If one group allows any entry and the other is a segregated group. Then the fully inclusive group would be by default the standard in most given context and the segregated group would be a speciality group.