ora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agoThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down19
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareeierschaukeln@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up61arrow-down1·4 days ago99999... 9^9^9^9^9^9^9... 9!!9!!9!!9!!9... 9↑↑↑↑9↑↑↑↑9↑↑↑↑9 ∞ Depends on what is allowed ig
minus-squareAnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-24 days agoSmall note, 9↑↑↑…↑↑9 Would be near infinitelymuch much much larger than just repeated hexation of 9 (Of course even just 9↑↑↑↑9 is too big to be written in the universe, so all of these numbers are practically a microdose of infinity)
minus-squarehakase@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 days agoIt’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
minus-squareReptilianCleric@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoI would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
minus-squareRobotFK@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoInfinty is a magnitude, not a number Also BB(8000) can (proven ) not be represented by ZFC so that might take the cake
minus-squareFoxfire@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoIf we get to bring infinity into the mix, how about larger infinite number sets? Aleph-omega time.
99999...9^9^9^9^9^9^9...9!!9!!9!!9!!9...9↑↑↑↑9↑↑↑↑9↑↑↑↑9∞Depends on what is allowed ig
Small note,
9↑↑↑…↑↑9
Would be
near infinitelymuch much much larger than just repeated hexation of 9(Of course even just 9↑↑↑↑9 is too big to be written in the universe, so all of these numbers are practically a microdose of infinity)
It’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
∞ ↑↑↑↑↑… ↑↑↑∞
Fair enough
I would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
Infinty is a magnitude, not a number
Also BB(8000) can (proven ) not be represented by ZFC so that might take the cake
If we get to bring infinity into the mix, how about larger infinite number sets? Aleph-omega time.
infinity is great indeed