• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 days ago

      My girlfriend’s sister has a horse and I refuse to go near it. It’s a two ton object being operated by a pea of a brain, he once got into a panic because his friend was behind him and he couldn’t see him, so he ran around the field madly until he collided with a stationary tree. Oh and he’s scared of blue wheelbarrows, just blue ones, wheelbarrows of any other colour or apparently acceptable.

      He has already stood on her foot once.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        two ton

        [Edit]

        Sorry, that was an arrogant way of phrasing it.

        What the hell kind of breed is two tons? The heaviest ones I know get up to about one ton, but those are big, heavy working horses, not the average riding horse.

        Most horses won’t be even a single ton. There are a few breeds of working horses that do get up to a ton, but most regular riding horses are a half ton, on average.

        [End of Edit]

        Our icelandic horse has also stood on my foot once, but she’s only about 300kg (600lbs) and didn’t put much of it on that foot before I shooed her off.

        Also, she’s super calm about damn near everything.
        First encounter with a motorised shear? Eyes wide open for a few seconds, then she’s already out of fucks to give.
        Shenanigans trying to craft a costume for her result in a piece of cloth suddenly covering her eyes? Eh, my humans will know what they’re doing. Actually, can I eat that? Nope, apparently not. Lame.

        The worst she’ll do when something actually does scare her is stand up straight, refuse to move closer and rarely attempt to put a little more distance. She might unexpectedly sidestep a weird object on the roadside, but not so rapidly as to dismount my wife, and she’s never run away in a panic that I know of.

        And if you scratch her right, she basically melts. Scratch her ears, she’ll relax her lower lip like she’s losing control of her face muscles. Scratch her butt, she’ll lean into it. Back away, she’ll follow. It’s the only case I’ve ever seen of a horse happily walking backwards.

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Just by asking what breed such a horse could possibly be, you’ve exemplified more horse related knowledge than most people possess. Two tons is pretty obviously a guess by someone that doesn’t know a lot about horses or other animals of similar size.

          Not much different to how most people would be wrong when estimating the weight of a building, the volume of the ocean, or the quantity of trees on the planet. If it’s something unfamiliar to you, you can’t be expected to be accurate.

          • luciferofastora@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            You know what, you’re right. I didn’t consider the perspective of people less familiar with the topic. I don’t consider myself particularly knowledgeable, but that doesn’t mean my knowledge is fundamental or ubiquitous.

            • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Kudos to you. Too few are capable of this type of reflection.

              When you know a bit about something, it’s always an easy thing to mistakenly presume others to know what seems like the most baseline of information about the subject matter.

              As it is for horses, only three breeds came to my mind. Clydesdale, carousel, and of course this genuine two ton beauty.

              • luciferofastora@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                When you know a bit about something, it’s always an easy thing to mistakenly presume others to know what seems like the most baseline of information about the subject matter.

                It’s a common human blind spot. I see no reason to get defensive about it. Better to admit it and improve than double down on a pointless battle with nothing to win.

                I know of a lot of things that I don’t know a lot about, which makes what knowledge I do have seem paltry by comparison. Exchanges like this are a handy reality check. Ideally, we can all walk away smarter for it.

                As it is for horses, only three breeds came to my mind. Clydesdale, carousel, and of course this genuine two ton beauty.

                Shire Horses, Brabanter (a Belgian breed, but I don’t know the English name) are the ones that I can think of, but I know there’s also some French breed up there. Don’t think any of them can hide a crew of crafty Greeks in their belly though. “Why is this taxidermied horse’s belly still moving?”

        • amorpheus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Consider yourself lucky. We were digging the ground with shovels near a horse park where they had a competition. A river separates the two areas.

          They asked us to stop because the horses were freaking out.

  • webp@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve got to improve those male pregnancy exam numbers, women are winning!

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is embarrassing to men. You’re suppose to walk off those sorts of injuries.

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not seeing anything inherently wrong with the data viz (obviously not talking about the veracity of the data itself or its geographic/linguistic scope as that’s another matter).

      Would you elaborate what you mean?

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        if you are going to bring up comparisons based on sex, you pollute the data including things that ONLY can possibly effect one sex. what good is it to compare how much post pregnancy care effects women vs men? or to have half the comparisons divvy all the different ways you can classify a motor cycle accident, where there is the same outcome for all of them.

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I assume it is based on data of people being admitted to hospitals, as titled. So my guess is this is more about how the medical system breaks the data down, and they selected for the highest disparities of reported sex.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            seems to point to men getting hurt based on high risk behavior or professional expectation. but women seem to be arriving for biological functions.

            though honestly if you consider child birth both a high risk behavior and and societal expectation then the comparison is valid, but more clarity on the why it’s like this would help.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The line item for obstetric and gynecological devices is interesting.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hey, I’m on there! Shout-out to my fellow people injured by power tools and household machinery.

  • gasgiant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    What on earth are these “Agents acting on muscles or breathing” that women seem to be much more prone to?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is a goofy graph. We have all these admissions of 100% female due to being female. Where’s the “had penis caught in chinese finger puzzle” admissions?

        • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          For now. I’ll see if I can fix that this weekend. Do you think multiple visits by the same person for the same issue count as one or multiple?

          • mapiki@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I think they should be separate. Like if a woman gives birth twice in one year (ow) that would be two visits.

            Can width of bars be changed based on number of visits? The pregnancy related ones probably skew the data. I know pie charts are terrible but could they be useful in this case?

          • luciferofastora@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t know how their dataset is filtered, but I suspect it should count as multiple.

            If they rerun the analysis next year and I see the figure pop up, I’ll know whose sacrifice to honour.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s solved by the medics on scene. You’d be surprised at just how effective my medical shears are and what they can cut…

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes. It’s shown on the right, and ought to have bee sorted by that.

      Also, notice the bottom text, that it excludes all cases where neither gender is more than 80%, so only extreme differences are shown.

      It’s carefully chosen to show some point, which might be interesting in some context, but not really interesting by itself without context.

  • DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ok, so what I am hearing is that I can significantly reduce the risk of motorcycle injuries by not being a man? Like how far do I need to go here, because if its just dressing in drag, it may be just the supporting data I will need to convince my wife to let me have a motorcycle “just one more time”

        • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Maybe a trans woman who was AMAB but had bottom surgery?

          Wouldn’t be capable of pregnancy but might need a gynecologist?

          This is all my guess - I don’t know much about these topics.

          • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            you usually see a gynecologist for pap smears once a year, but there might be one willing to do prostate exams for post-op trans women … usually trans affirming gynecologists are for pro-op trans men

            maybe post-op trans women would see a gynecologist, just not sure what for

            edit: looking it up, a gynecologist is recommended for post-op trans women, looks like a gynecologist can even function as a primary care doctor!

            Common reasons to go include treating granulation, checking for yeast infections and STIs, and performing pelvic exams which might catch potential cancers.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      The full title of that entry is actually “Obstetric and gynaecological devices associated with adverse incidents”, so maybe some of the men are actually the OB/GYN themselves that are getting injured in the course of their work? The raw number is only 19 cases, so I could see that being plausible

      Alternatively, with so few cases, could it be intersex people who are still categorised as male under whatever criteria this is using? 1.7% seems a touch high for that, but maybe things go wrong more often for said intersex people

      Edit: wait, 90 of the cases are 0-year-olds. I’m definitely going with injuries to babies during difficult births / C-sections / similar