• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    198
    ·
    15 days ago

    Since there is insufficient cell differentiation at conception to produce any reproductive cells, does that mean that according to the white house, all people are legally non-binary now?

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    YOU KNOW WHO I WORRY ABOUT COMING INTO WOMEN’S BATHROOMS, CONSERVATIVES?

    CIS MEN.

    I HAVE LITERALLY NEVER HAD A TRANS WOMAN MAKE ME FEEL UNSAFE IN THERE. BUT I HAVE HAD CIS MEN FOLLOW ME IN AND ATTEMPT ASSAULT.

    MEN DON’T NEED TO GO THROUGH THE CONVOLUTED STEPS OF TRANSITIONING TO GAIN ACCESS TO WOMEN’S BATHROOMS, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS

    MAYBE ADDRESS THAT FIRST? NO???

    HOLY FUCKING SHIT

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      They believe that anyone can claim they’re a woman now and that’s it. And once it’s done they can just walk into women’s bathrooms. They’re just telling on themselves, projecting on trans people. They’re just sex obsessed freaks, all of them.

        • gingernate@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 days ago

          I grew up in a fundie church as well. No one escapes unscathed. Glad you got out. I hope you’re able to heal. Fuck Bill Gothard!

      • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        We just had a Nazi change her legal status to woman probably to fuck with the system and try to get into a women’s prison. Now she will probably be send to a male prison and referred to as a woman.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’ve said that if I was wealthy, I would force legislation that was trans friendly by (as a cis woman) going into women’s bathrooms in Congress, standing on toilets, and staring at women.

      Women’s bathrooms don’t have urinals! There’s no reason for anyone to be afraid of anyone seeing anything in there, unless they stand on toilets, and Im fully of the opinion that the gender of the person doing that has nothing to do with how creepy it is!!

      Maybe if you’re actually worried, all bathrooms should be, I dunno, gender neutral with full doors that close all the way? For maximum safety?

      And I believe nothing can get that point across quite like demonstrating that I, as an almost middle aged, fat woman who looks like I could safely run for a Rwpublican seat, standing on toilets and staring at people.

      Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 days ago

        Maybe if you’re actually worried, all bathrooms should be, I dunno, gender neutral with full doors that close all the way? For maximum safety?

        They made a bathroom at my university that’s gender neutral with stalls that are fully ceiling to floor with no gaps in the door.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        as an almost middle aged, fat woman who looks like I could safely run for a Rwpublican seat, standing on toilets

        I’m kind of worried about your safety now, since public restrooms don’t generally have toilet lids. Perhaps bring a stool to safely appear to be standing on the toilet.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 days ago

      wait … so if I just walk through the door I’m suddenly in the women’s bathroom? no force field?

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    15 days ago

    “You know what we mean!”

    So we’re back to gender being a social construct then.

  • vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    It’s the gamete crowd, but adapted for the crowd that can’t spell “gamete”.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    15 days ago

    Maybe I’m a late bloomer but I started producing reproduce cells long after conception

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m no biologist, but I’m pretty sure nobody produces gametes at conception. If you want to be pedantic, oocytes form before birth, but actual sperm and eggs don’t show up till puberty (feel free to correct me).

    Now, I would LOVE if we don’t assign gender till puberty, but I still don’t like the method.

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      i’ve always thought the egg cells were produced before birth and at puberty they just start being released

      and i agree about not assigning gender until puberty. kids before puberty barely even show any sexual dimorphism anyway. though i have to say there would need to be A LOT of educating people about sex and gender before we get there

  • AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    14 days ago

    I would think “if you have a Y chromosome, you’re male” would be a better definition to fit what they’re trying to do

    • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 days ago

      There’s like a not insignificant 1% of people who are intersex where looking at chromosomes can get tricky.

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Chromosomes are almost never tested at birth, and so 99% of people walking around don’t actually know what chromosomes they have. Enforcing any law based on chromosomes for purposes like this would be nearly impossible.

      • Yozul@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Nobody’s checking the size of sex gametes that embryos are producing at conception, either. Didn’t stop them from saying that.

        What, are they going to start having people provide sperm or eggs at the DMV so that they can use a set of tiny calipers to figure out how to fill out the gender on your license?

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      the thing is that there is no good hard definition of sexes, the best you can do is just go “they fill the general role of male” but guess what! that includes trans people :))

      • AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yes, I never said it’s perfect. But it would work in most cases. Unlike their lazy definition

  • jontree255@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    This is either AI slop. Ignorant because they think babies are made by god and immediately have genitals. Deliberately as anti science as possible to muddy things further.

    Probably all 3.

    • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yup. At conception, I’m prettybsure there’s really fuck all going on - plus, how’s it getting measured? Most people aren’t that sure of their date of conception!

      So then what? We look at the organs at birth? (Gender=sex)

      • festnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        they just need a time machine to travel back and test which gametes the single cell is producing. just wait until they discover it takes quite a bit until those are produced

        unless they meant to say at birth, cause at conception it makes no sense. so what the heck happens to anyone who has both genitalia? what about people who can’t produce gametes? they have no idea what they’re doing lmao

        also what were those definitions before?

        • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yes, it’s a fuster of clucks, for sure.

          Now this would be fine if it was just a headline or something, but these dipshits made it legislation!

          Thank god I live far, far away…