• TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Obligatory mention that you don’t need to cut out meat from your life entirely to have a significant impact on your carbon footprint and your health. Going mostly vegetarian is also an option and its basically been the default of humanity since the agricultural revolution.

    • Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      It’s really beef that is the vast majority of emissions just cutting that out of your diet gets most of the environmental benefits of vegetarian.

  • CheesyFingers@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Non-vegans should support vegans, even if they continue to eat meat, because vegans drive better treatment of animals and also drive more attractive non-animal food options.

    However, a person must have a brain and also not have meat eating tied to their masculinity.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, you can’t say the conditions we’re subjecting livestock to is “good”. You don’t give up your rights to eat bbq if you admit it.

  • KimLuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Everyone I know actually unironically feels this way lol and always comes to me for advice on going more vegan. Vegan hatred is a strong flea dip for me though, basically any% criticism of vegans ensures I will likely never speak to you again.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Is it awful of me to have stopped eating meat from animals I think are beautiful and sweet, like cows and pigs, but still eat meat from some animals I think are ugly and mean, like chickens and sheeps?

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        As a non-vegan, that seems to be morally neutral to me (you’re still eating meat), barring differences in treatment and ecological impact of specific animals (I think cows are particularly bad in terms of environmental impact?)

    • Axolotl.cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      basically any% criticism of vegans ensures I will likely never speak to you again.

      Tbh this is kind of a stupid behavior, if it’s a valid criticism i don’t see why you’d have to react like that

      • KimLuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        It’s not, because criticising “vegans” is done to avoid discussing veganism, which is objectively better than meat eating. This does not include people who say, argue whether starving people should eat meat to survive, which is not a criticism of vegans. I’m open to discussing any real life actual moral paradigms with reasonable people.

        Basically you’re assuming it’s not purely coincidence. Plenty of my friends eat meat lol. They’re just rational and not the type of person who thinks I deserve to be cross examined for the actions of all people who are also vegan. People who act like I should like, idk, answer for PETA? My life has objectively improved by letting those bridges burn naturally. It’s done wonders for my mental health.

        • Axolotl.cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          because criticising “vegans” is done to avoid discussing veganism

          In that case it’s probably not a valid criticism

          Basically you’re assuming it’s not purely coincidence

          I am not gettin this, sorry

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I’m in this picture and feel pretty neutral about that.

    One time I had a hardcore combo meth-heroin addict who was vegan who candidly told me something to the effect of ‘idgaf what I put in my body I just have a moral problem with the livestock industry’ and I was like ‘you know what, based.’ The core issue of that conversation was that dietary sent a roll with dinner and they were like ‘naaah I can tell by the texture they used cows butter’ and like many things in the hospital they’re probably right and also at least they recognized I had no way of fixing it.

  • Sailor Anarres@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No its not fine to oppress others even if you know you are wrong to. You sound like a founding father who writes that slavery is wrong but brutally exploits slaves anyway.

    • trevor (any/all) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yup. The leftism leaves so many leftists’ bodies the moment animal liberation comes up. If you recognize the problem, don’t be complacent on the solution.

      Unlike so many other rights struggles, basic veganism doesn’t require action, but rather the cessation of harmful actions. In that regard, it’s easier than taking action against other forms of exploitation: simply stop consuming animal products. Plant-based alternatives are readily available (I went vegan in a food desert) and are better for you than eating some poor animal’s flesh.

      • kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The biggest hurdle, is the meat-eating culture, and how it is the dominant one in many places, right now. People need certain mental strenght to go againt the culture around them, especially when they have been raised up with it, and not all have that. If all people around you are vegans, and it is considered the norm, a lot of people would become vegan too, just to fit in. As long as meat-eating is seen as normal and people are raised to believe it is normal, many people will continue, even if they agree vegans are right.

  • Malica@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    People don’t wanna by hypocrites as if that can ever be truly avoided

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maaan. That is me, with so many things. At least I’m moving in the right direction, or so I like to tell me.

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Veganism isn’t about not eating what was or is “alive”. It’s about “suffering” (and avoiding it as much as possible).

      You can find that fundamental belief in Buddhism or Jainism too. If you think about it, you can probably find it in you. Why would anybody want to make any other sentient body suffer?

      • deadalus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Veganism can also be about environmental impact. I’m vegetarian mostly because a meat based diet isn’t sustainable on a global scale. While I’m obviously happy about the reduced suffering, it’s importance is only in second place for me.

        Tho maybe veganism is pretty much entirely for reducing animals suffering, I’m only a vegetarian and won’t pretend to know for sure.

        • DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          It’s a widespread misunderstanding but adopting a plant based diet for some reason other than avoiding the exploitation of animals isn’t veganism. Praying five times a day isn’t Islam unless you’re praying to Allah.

        • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          While I’m obviously happy about the reduced suffering, it’s importance is only in second place for me.

          that’s confusing. I don’t know how to reply.

          why is “environmental impact” concerning you if it’s not for the suffering it causes and will cause?

      • APF@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        We are only just beginnig to understand what plants feel. They have hormons they have pain rezeptors they have a basic neural net.

        To assume a plant would not suffer is a little outdated.

        Even 20 Yeats ago it was already known that plants do feel pain. they inform surrounding plants about pain and they react to it.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Even if we took that as true, directly eating plants still kills fewer plants than feeding them to animals and then eating those animals.

        • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          to assume plants are sentient is a charognard propaganda

          outdated? pfff… Receptors doesn’t mean “pain rezeptors”. Don’t seed confusion.

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If you are eating boring meat like chicken breast or ground beef you might as well make it vegan or get some fat on it

  • EloySg@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Theyre not? We are apes,apes like of veggies and meat.

    Plus, we are one of the most carnivore of the big apes,our guts are adapted to both meat and vegetables, we are not able to decompose celulose.

    • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Crazy it’s like you don’t know one single thing about the vegan viewpoint and are arguing entirely against strawmen.

      You know, the way people who are wrong and don’t have the maturity to admit it or at least the education to put forth an actual counter argument might do.

    • ziltoid101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t think anyone would deny we are adapted for an omnivorous diet. But we are omnivores rather than obligate carnivores, so meat consumption does remain a choice rather than an imperative. Should our biology dictate our morality?

      • EloySg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No, but our morality cant really dictate our biology either.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Should our biology dictate our morality?

        Should evolutionary proximity dictate our morality?

        We understand animals, because they are closer to us than plants. But plants are also living creatures. The fact is, unless you photosynthesise, every large living being has to consume another to survive.

        I think the choice is much more complex than meat vs vegan. I think it comes down to farming practices, particularly industrial farming which min/maxes everything and cuts corners as much as they can get away with to save on cost.

        Palm oil is vegan. Yet palm oil farming is the cause of a great deal of habitat and species loss. Palm oil is quietly used in a lot of vegan food.

      • EloySg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And? the thing is that still we can make do, its like implying a modern PC cannot run a NES game.

        You have to emulate stuff btw.

        • infiniteCAD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          giving the most benefit of the doubt to you here.

          when the post says “vegans are obviously right”, assuming that to mean that humans are made to not eat meat is a very bad faith interpretation. similar equating can happen when someone says all genders are equal and someone pulls out the sexual dimorphism research to claim they aren’t. there’s missing context of what is being said and what is being interpreted. i dont believe there’s a substantial group of vegans claiming humans are incapable or not ‘evolved’ to eat meat.

          i am not debating that humans are apes, most carnivore, or adapted to both meat and vegetables. i don’t agree there, citations needed, but taking it as a mere simplification of facts its fine enough.

          there’s complexity to the question of eating meat now that society has reached a point where we no longer need it to sustain ourselves. i am not arguing either way here but an argument there exists and we will need to have an answer to it. just like we didnt evolve to be able to see if our eyes fuck up, but we managed to just have spectacles (and surgery) to fix it. we can adopt to a non-meat diet if that is the answer, whether or not we evolved for it.

          i am conflicted on if vegans are right. but i can appreciate that they are at least right on pointing towards the question.

          • EloySg@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            So that by itself is a very good question, but the ability of not consuminy it should not mean the obligation(or prohibition), or even the morals on the wheter of eating or not eating meat.

            So thats my argument, we really should not matter that much about what is on the meal of people by itself. Maybe, one day, artificial meat becomes better than normal one and we end up replacing meat, and humannity, accidentally, end up as a vegan species by itself.

            The thing is that involving the morally good or wrong about something like food shouldnt be a thing if it can be improved or obsoleted.

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We are apes,apes like of veggies and meat.

      Go tell that to a gorilla. Being a great ape, ‘it’ would punch you to a pulp and go eat some “celulose” (sic). You would rot in vain.

  • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is a super hot take so bare with me, but the conditions of a lot of vegan food production are also often harmful to the humans that grow the food (I’m talking blood produce) and the growth in popularity of certain superfoods have severely damaged the ecosystems that indigenous populations in the areas where they’re from depended on.

    This is not to say being vegan is bad. It’s obviously proven to be better for the environment, and the way that animals are treated is absolutely inhumane.

    This is to say however that we should be demanding sustainability in all our food consumption and respect for all living beings. But mostly, it’s to say fuck capitalism.

    • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      By vegan food production you must mean processed fake meat? Not all vegans eat a horrible diet.

      If you mean vegan food production as in normal non-meat foods such as vegetables than that’s a while opinion. Unless you are Jain or just want to die, we got to eat something.

      Most food production in general kills a lot more than I would like especially vegetable and fruit production. Not much to do on the regard though.

      • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes I did mean veg and fruit, but I mean that obviously we need to eat but we need to do it in a sustainable and fair way.

        Currently a lot of the produce in Canada & the US is grown by migrant labour where people are treated horribly. In Mexico, many of the agricultural production sites are owned by cartels. Quinoa used to be a primary food source for quechuan (peruvian indigenous) people but when it grew in popularity in the west, it became too expensive for those who depended on it. There are many more examples.

        What there is to do about it is to demand better agricultural practices and support fair-trade, co-ops, and sustainable food vendors. In the same way we should be / are demanding cruelty-free and sustainable animal products.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Unless you are Jain or just want to die, we got to eat something.

        That’s the thing though, why should plants be more eligible for eating than animals? Both are living. Animals are closer to us, so we can understand them better, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t being just as harmful to plants.

        I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with eating another animal for sustenance. Just the same as there isn’t anything wrong with eating a plant for sustenance. What matters is what we do before we eat them.

        • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Are you stupid? Genuine question, because animals need to eat as well for you to pay someone to murder them. Even going from the assumption that plants suffer too, a plant based diet still causes much fewer plants to die compared to feeding the plants inefficiently to animals to then eat the animals.

        • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Plants cannot think or feel as animals can. Arguing a tomato has the emotions and thought of a dog or pig is just silly.

          Killing a pig versus a tomato is not the same thing dawg

          • TWeaK@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            5 hours ago

            as animals can.

            As we can. We understand how animals think, because evolutionarily they’re closer to us. We don’t really understand how plants “think” or “feel”, we just decide that because they don’t have what we have that makes it okay.

            • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Just making up whatever you want aren’t you?

              “I’m not a plant therefore idk what their nonthinking minds are thinking”

              Who is we in your statement? Pretty sure modern botany understands how plants work and interact.

    • nerdo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m doing more good as an antinatalist than any vegan

    • TWeaK@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      we should be demanding sustainability in all our food consumption and respect for all living beings

      Hear hear.

      Plants are living beings, also. The fact is, unless you photosynthesise, you likely have to consume another living being to survive.

      What nearly everyone can agree on is that industrial farming practices are harmful. Not just to the living things we farm, but also to the consumers, who end up consuming a lesser product that is often contaminated by industrial processes that cut corners to save on cost.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Nah, there are definitely some vegetarian and vegan foods (especially when we’re talking ultraprocessed foods) that are worse for the environment and worse for your health than just plain meat or cheese.

      • SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Genuinely which ones? Everything I can think of is better than meat. Largely because the cows eat a lot of food in the first place with most of it being wasted.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          It’s been a good long while since I made my comparisons but i believe Quorn was worse than chicken (but not as bad as beef obviously). In Sweden we also have Anamma which used to be very good, but at some point they removed their classic formulations and suddenly added like 30% sugar to everything (and doubled the price for good measure). Not sure if they’ve walked that back by now, hopefully they have.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In the UK there’s a sweet maker called Candy Kittens. They make, like, vegan Haribo (only better) that tastes really really nice.

        They’ve started making their own vegan peanut M&M’s. Instead of chocolate they use a shit ton of palm oil.

        It’s “ethically sourced” palm oil, but that’s still a sour thought after you’ve devoured a whole bag of tasty sweet treats in one sitting. It’s still increasing the market capacity for palm oil, which in turn increases demand to destroy habitats eg orangutans in Indonesia and other SE Asian islands.

        TL;DR palm oil is vegan.

  • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t argue about whether or not people should be vegan. I just know that my quality of life would be vastly diminished as I really don’t enjoy most vegan food. If they can nail lab created meat, I’m all for it.

    • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think you might be shocked how easy it is to eat tasty vegan food, saying you dont enjoy"most vegan food" implies to me that you’ve only had a really limited selection of what’s available. Highly recommend trying ethiopian food.

      • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ethiopian veggies are great but yebeg wot is on a different level.

        There’s tasty vegan food for sure hut there’s usually a slightly tastier horrifically unethical alternative.

        I agree with op, I think vegans are right, I basically support them but ain’t converting. Realizing they were right on food made me a lot less angry that other people don’t feel the same way I do about sweatshop clothes and they, like me are doing their best. Some prioritise animals in tortorous conditions, others prioritise kids in poor ones, others look after drug addled first worlders, everyone’s got their own moral priorities.

    • Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I very much doubt it would be unless you’re already artificially limiting what you’re eating

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean, depending on where you’re from, you can already get most meat products in a convincing non-lab alternative, at least from what I hear from colleagues. (I don’t have an opinion on this, because I don’t like meat. 🫠)